There’s Finally an Alternative to BMI — But Is It Any Better?

The Body Roundness Index (BRI) is making headlines as a new tool to replace BMI. But what's the difference? And is it helpful? In this article, Dr. Wassenaar shares her concerns with BRI and BMI as health indicators and how these tools are used. "The reality is our bodies are complex; they reflect so many things about who we are, and the generations before us that brought us to today. To reduce life to a single number, about a single body part, is reflective of an ongoing problem -- that our current understanding and working with humans reduces them to numbers in a medical chart," said Wassenaar.

Published: Nov 08, 2024

Originally created nearly 200 years ago, body mass index (commonly known as BMI) has grown to become a premier indicator of health. The ratio of height-to-weight metric is widely used in medicine to estimate body fat and label people as fit, overweight, obese, or extremely obese. But critics note that the risk-of-disease measure doesn’t adequately account for body-fat percentage, bone density, or muscle mass — nor does it delineate abdominal fat from gluteofemoral fat, important factors regarding insulin resistance, metabolic disease, and cardiovascular issues. Further, ethical and racial concerns have long clouded BMI’s relevance: No women were included in the 1970s studies that brought BMI to the forefront. What’s more, these studies were not properly representative of different ethnicities, races, and backgrounds, according to a 2023 academic literature review of BMI. Making the waters even murkier, BMI was never intended for medical use — its innovator (a statistician) and modernizer (a physiologist who coined the term in the ’70s) were researchers, not medical professionals.

Read More